Here is the mail that hit our network at many different addresses yesterday.  Classic gmail spam.  It uses a gmail “from:” and “reply to:”, but it is sent from some lame ISP that permits spammers.

The mail gets accepted in part because most ISPs are unwilling to unilaterally block all gmail accounts.

But the real issue is that gmail has a LAME Sender ID policy.  They have a SPF Record – all very pretty and full of detail.  But look at the last bit of the record – the “~all” section.   This is an explicit declaration that nothing can be said about the validity of the mail from gmail. In their case, this is an understatement.

According to the SPF guidelines at http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax the “?” means “Neutral – The SPF record specifies explicitly that nothing can be said about validity – action is to accept”

Many small ISPs use a similar SPF record – I am certain we do.  But most small ISPs deal with their clients that send bad mail – they terminate the accounts.

Google has a responsibility to the community – quit freeloading on our networks and do the right thing!  At least live up to your Core Principals statement and DO NO EVIL!

Related posts:

1. Spammers, Phishers, and Thieves – Oh My!
2. TwelveHorses.com Sucks on behalf of their Clients
3. Google Maps and Kayakers in Cahoots

You might ask how can this be.  After all how could they be technically challenged – they run a huge on-line banking empire (paid for with our dollars no doubt).

They openly permit spammers, phishers, and thieves to steal their identity and send mail pretending to be from the bank.  These messages lead the user to a spoofed web site that pretends to be the bank – and there they get the “mark” to type in their user and password.  Once the bad guys have that information, they can clean the victims bank accounts out – and end up causing more losses for the bank and we all end up paying for.

bankofamerica.com uses a “sender id” tool called SPF – Sender Policy Framework.  It is a simple protocol where the bank publishes the addresses of the servers that are allowed to send mail as being from “@bankofamerica.com.”   It is very simple and every ISP in the world is able to see it.

This makes it easy for companies like mine that perform the service of checking mail for viruses/spam/phish/etc.  After all, if you know the only places mail could come FROM then you can check and refuse it if it is not.

But the tech wizards at bankofamerica.com must have been in the bottom half of their class or they are all on the payroll of the spammers, phishers, and thieves.

They set up their SPF record all right and it tells us exactly where mail should come from when it claims to be from bankofamerica.com – good so far!  Then they expressly instruct companies like mine to ignore that by instructing us to “soft fail” the e-mail.  It says the sending server is “NOT being allowed to send but is in transition” and that we should “accept but mark.”

They are telling us to go ahead and accept the mail from any spammers/phishers/and thieves that chooses to impersonate them – that they JUST DON’T CARE.

Thank you Bank of America – can I have another for the people that are footing the bill for your bailout!

There really ought to be a law that clearly says ANY institution that uses EMAIL or has an ONLINE presence and handles ANY sort of confidential information MUST use a proper SENDER ID technology to help stop the spammers, phishers, and thieves.

—for those who would like the details —

———-Headers on the above referenced mail———
Return-Path: <message@bankofamerica.com>
X-Original-To: snipped@snipped.net
Delivered-To: snipped@snipped.net
Received: from snipped (unknown [snipped])
by snipped (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5D1C6120
for <snipped@snipped; Thu,  8 Oct 2009 14:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snipped ([snipped])
by snipped with esmtp ()
id 1MvxZr-0005Wr-00
for snipped@snipped; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:18:59 -0400
Received: from ip67-88-159-227.z159-88-67.customer.algx.net ([67.88.159.227]:42029 helo=SOILTECH-FS1.soiltech.local)
by snipped with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <message@bankofamerica.com>)
id 1MvxZo-0001qd-La
for snipped@snipped; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:19:04 -0400
Received: from bankofamerica.com ([66.58.232.199]) by SOILTECH-FS1.soiltech.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:18:23 -0700
From: Bank of America <message@bankofamerica.com>
To: snipped@snipped
Subject:  Account Information
Date: 08 Oct 2009 10:18:24 -0800
Message-ID: <20091008101824.ED2BC8B2B7611025@bankofamerica.com>

——————

—-the content of the phish mail ———–

Bank of America

Dear Bank of America user,
You have 1 new ALERT message
Please login to your Bank of America Online
and visit the Message Center section in order to read the message.

To Login, please click the link below:

Go To Bank of America Online

Bank of America, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender
© 2009 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.

————————–
—SPF record (from www.dnsstuff.com – note the ~all at the end)——–
You have an SPF record. This is very good, as it will help prevent spammers from abusing your domain. Your SPF record (I don’t check to see if it is well designed!) is:

“v=spf1 include:_sfspf.bankofamerica.com include:_txspf.bankofamerica.com include:_vaspf.bankofamerica.com include:_cfcspf.bankofamerica.com ~all”

—————————–

—-Open SPF – definitions —–
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax

SoftFail The SPF record has designated the host as NOT being allowed to send but is in transition accept but mark

———————————

Related posts:

1. Google, remember: DO NO EVIL!!!
2. TwelveHorses.com Sucks on behalf of their Clients
3. Domain Submission Service Sucks!

So once upon a time, there was this dude known as President Obama… and he had this thing called an interview… during this interview, he swatted and to his suprise, killed a fly.

And most people are thinking at this point… yeah, so?

But not PETA, clearly:

PETA is sending Obama a bug catching device, which allows people to capture insects and set them free.

“It’s not a huge deal. One might even call it a non-story. But if the media wants to talk about fly-swatting, we’ll talk about compassion, even for flies.”

The White House is declining to comment.
(source)

If it’s not a huge deal, then why make the gesture?  Even the suggestion is kinda openly condescending guys.  A fly is a fly. There are millions more. If they choose to bug me, I will sure as hell bug them back.  And that may involve swatting. It may even get brutal with some squishing.  Dare I say, there may even be… splatting. Holy crap.

*rolls eyes*

There’s already an influx of giant bears and deer everywhere.  If we’re forced to be more “humane” to insects and let them all go, then we’d better gear up like Starship Troopers for some mega pest control.

Related posts:

1. Bill O’Reilly totally sucks
2. Hypocrites at PETA Suck. Plain and Simple.
3. Just when you though PETA couldn’t get more ridiculous…

I’m going to think really long and hard about 250 characters I can use to explain to Former (almost ) President Bush how much of a flippin’ loser I think he is. If anyone has any ideas of their own, click the link, sign the card. Do it!!

When you go there, you get to ready the super funny “card.”

President and Mrs. Bush,

Thank you for your outstanding service and courageous leadership. I am grateful for your hard work and commitment to build a better, safer, more prosperous America. Best wishes to you in the years ahead.

A better, safer, more prosperous America? What?!? Better, safer and more prosperous than when? I don’t know what drugs Rush Limbaugh has been passing out at GOP parties, but they must be good ones!

Just because he didn’t get busted getting a blow job in the Oval Office does not mean he brought honor and integrity back! In fact I think he did anything but that.

The following is the spam from the GOP. I only removed my name, email address, some html and some images asking for donations.

Related posts:

1. The Bush Administration Comes To An End!!!!
2. Oh Jeebus
3. Guess the Crime

‘Santa Baby‘ singer passes away on Christmas Day… it seems strangely appropriate but still very sad. Really sucks that we’ve lost so many unique characters this year.

“Eartha Kitt, who purred and pounced her way across Broadway stages, recordings and movie and television screens in a show-business career that lasted more than six decades, died on Thursday. She was 81 and lived in Connecticut.”

Read More at the NY Times

Related posts:

1. Top Ten Sucky things to do on your web site
2. Christmas Sweaters that Suck
3. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck (we don’t own a calendar)

Is NOT a good holiday gift!

I have to say today was tough. The runners up were Maguays/Gremlins, a usb pole dancer, and the thighmaster. The gremlins lost, because as long as you keep them dry and feed them before midnight, they’re cute as hell. The usb pole dancer lost because, well, I just hope nobody buys it. The thighmaster lost because there was only one really funny picture on their web site.

After seeing Tony Little’s web site, and the banner that shows him holding a dog and kind of looks like he’s friends with this guy, the Gazelle won!

People! Nobody wants to see this guy under the Christmas tree!!! He’s scary! Not to mention a featured product that is called “Tony’s Little Cheeks” is just flippin’ weird!

So people out there, please refrain from calling that 800 number in the next 10 minutes to make sure you get the bonus “Little Cheeks” with your Gazelle! I know its only costing you 15 easy payments of $89.45; but please, resist the urge! Don’t call now! Stop!

Related posts:

1. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck – Sarah Palin Glasses
2. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck – Fugly Sweaters
3. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts that Suck – The Necklace Shirt

They could have had a shoot out at the Crawford Ranch…

All of the McCain/Palin supporters have warned us, we haven’t heard the last from her! That being said, go ahead and put away your Palin clone glasses you bought before the election. Don’t try to wrap them up and give them to someone else.

Eyedoctors – don’t try to get rid of them by sending them out in Christmas cards to your patients. Put them away in storage, cause like the Governator says…”She’ll be back!”

Please local newslady, we know you think they make you look all smart and sophisticated even when you wear her brand of hooker shoes, but let it go. Maybe you can wear them again in four more years.

And you, pitbull down the street! You’re not fooling anybody!!!

Related posts:

1. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts that Suck – Excercise Equipment
2. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck – And are really crappy
3. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck – Fugly Sweaters

Make Your Own »

Related posts:

1. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts That Suck – Fugly Sweaters
2. Ugly Christmas Sweaters
3. 12 Days of Holiday Gifts that Suck – Spiritual Experience

www.josephmichaels.com and www.twelvehorses.com have either harvested email addresses, or bought and used a list of emails harvested off the internet. This makes them spammers because are sending unsolicited bulk email. Oh, that’s not so bad, the Republican party did the same thing for the election.

Okay, really it is bad. Its as if they were riding around in the back of the mail truck writing “Buy Counterfeit Viagra” on the back of all your mail and then have your mail carrier deliver it to you. Then when you ask him to stop, he tells all of his buddies to join him, then there’s more and more, pretty soon your trash is overflowing and you have to call the trash company and pay extra to have them pick up the extra trash. I would be pretty pissed at the guy doing all of that.

Hey, If you feel like it, give them a call:

Here goes – SPAM – Disguised as legitimate marketing – from the people over at twelvehorses.com and josephmichaels.com. If you like, tell them what you think at 1(800) 786-1099 or 1.866.846.2846

Copy of messages below:

Chris

So what you are saying is that it is OK to send unsolicited commercial mail until someone complains and then you will remove them.

That is not any different than most of the million other unsolicited mailers our network sees every day.

I appreciate more than most the need to get a message out. But I don’t think this is the right way. On the other hand, it clearly makes money for someone. And if that is the primary goal, then what does it matter that you make it a million and one messages into my network.

The right thing to do was to acknowledge that you stole this mail address off the Internet or bought it from someone who did. And that you see the error of your ways and that you are going to go straightaway to work and come by your fortunes the old fashioned way.

But then if I am so smart, why ain’t I rich?

Best to you.

Bruce C

Chris wrote:
>
>
> Hello Bruce,
>
>
>
> You have been unsubscribed from the system. A block has also been placed on our system so that you cannot receive emails from Josephmichaels via our platform ever again. I have confirmed that this unsubscribe/block took place before we ever viewed your email via our automated system. We have also contacted Josephmichaels and they have removed your information from their system as well. I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused you.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Chris – Twelve Horses Technical Support
>
>
>
> * From: * Bruce xxxxxx [mailto:bxxxxxx@xxxxxx.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:57 AM
> *To:* abuse@twelvehorses.com; hostmaster@viawest.net
> *Subject:* abuse from your network – [Fwd: The Network! #216 – Joe Pelayo Radio interview]
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> re: Abuse from your network.
>
> Spry – this is promoting services running on your network.
>
> Viawest – this mail came from your network
>
> Josephmichaels – don’t know if you are even close to a real entity – but
> if you are, you are part of the problem. Get a real job!
>
> Bruce C
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: brucec@mailtest.xxxxxx.net
> Delivered-To: brucec@mailtest.xxxxxx.net
> Received: from holalesqua.xxxxxx.net (holalesqua.xxxxxx.net [69.214.62.7])
> by falstaff.xxxxxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797E1B448
> for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:09:27 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from correo4.xxxxxx.net ([69.214.62.37])
> by holalesqua.xxxxxx.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
> id 1L7cUm-0004X0-00
> for bxxxxxx@xxxxxx.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:09:24 -0500
> Received: from s02.mailout.twelvehorses.com ([64.90.205.70]:18753)
> by correo4.xxxxxx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
> (envelope-from )
> id 1L7cky-0008KI-Mz
> for bxxxxxx@xxxxxx.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:26:32 -0500
> Received: from fvdywvj.jmuttc.th.s02.b.12hs.com (192.168.4.54)
> by s02.mailout.twelvehorses.com with SMTP; 02 Dec 2008 14:08:52 -0700
> Message-ID:
> <17196921.1228252132711.JavaMail.dynamo1@app05.prv.twelvehorses.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:08:51 -0700 (MST)
> From: Joe Pelayo
> To:
> Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?The_Network!__#216_=96_Joe_Pelayo_Radio_interview?=
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=”—-=_Part_64321_28212338.1228252131098″
> User-Agent: Dialog Server
> Received-SPF: pass
>
> ——=_Part_64321_28212338.1228252131098
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Description: This is text version of an eMessage
>
> =A0
> What do John McCain, Barak Obama and Joe Pelayo have in common?=A0They
> were all interviewed on WSRadio recently.=A0To hear my interview, click
> here: =A0
>
> > ichaels.com/about/president.shtml*http_mm_url_mm_www.josephmichaels.com/abo=
> ut/president.shtml>
>
>
>
> To hear the other interviews, well you?ve probably heard enough from the
> other two in the last several months…
> Click the above link to hear Joe Pelayo interviewed on the
> PriceWaterhouseCoopers Radio show on WSRadio.com with host Steve
> Bengstrom.=A0Be sure you have 5 minutes or so, and have your speakers on.
>
>
>
> Joe Pelayo=A0- On the economy and the stock market:
> Maybe Chicken Little was right after all and the sky IS falling. But,
> you know how the media is so often on the lookout for bad news because
> it sells more newspapers. =A0I?m not saying everything is rosy, but to
> keep things in perspective, here are a few things to consider. =A0
> Yes the Dow fell in big numbers and on one day fell more points than it
> had fallen ever has. =A0But, did you know, that on a percentage basis,
> that big drop would not have even ranked in the top twenty drops of
> all-time?=20
>
> For example in 1987 the Dow dropped a record 500 points. Remember, they
> called it Black Monday? =A0At that time it represented a 22% drop.
> From September 3rd, 1929 to July 8th, 1932, the Dow dropped 339 points.
> That?s nothing in today?s measure in terms of points, but at the time,
> it represented an 89% drop from 389 points to 41.22, Wow! =A0
> So when the media mentions a big point drop, do a few things… First,
> do the math and look at the percentages. =A0Also, realize that for awhile,
> 300 is the new 100, you will see wide fluctuations for a time.=20
> As the media goes wild saying that, at this time, the Dow dropped the
> biggest point total in history. Don?t forget, 5 years ago, the Dow
> reached its high point total in the history of time! Keep things in
> perspective and even if Chicken Little says the sky is falling, remember
> that Joe Pelayo says that it isn?t. But, I am a devout optimist.
> The media would lead you to believe no one is hiring.=A0However, we are
> receiving calls still and new searches. =A0Smart companies, with the
> resources make use of times like these, to strategically top-grade their
> talent.=A0
>
> Joseph Michaels, Inc. can help you recruit executives who don?t think
> the sky is falling. People who you can bank on to get things done, even
> in uncertain times.=A0Call us today at 1(800) 786-1099.
> Warm regards,
>
>
>
> Joe Pelayo, C.E.O.
> Joseph Michaels, Inc.
> One Market Street
> Spear Tower , Suite 3600=20
> San Francisco , CA 94105=20
> Voice (415) 732-6142 FAX (415) 434-1165
> Email: jpelayo@josephmichaels.com
>
> Website:
> > ichaels.com/*http_mm_url_mm_www.josephmichaels.com/>
>
> 30-second Flash Mailer: http://www.josephmichaels.com/flashDemo.htm
> > ichaels.com/flashDemo.htm%20*http_mm_url_mm_www.josephmichaels.com/flashDem=
> o.htm%20>
>
>
>
> The Network is one of the most widley read executive e-newsletters in
> the world.=A0If you were forwarded this email, To add yourself to the
> mailing list click here:=20
>
>
>
> To remove from the mailing list click unsubscribe below:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ——– Original Message ——–
> Subject: The Network! #216 – Joe Pelayo Radio interview
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:08:51 -0700 (MST)
> From: Joe Pelayo
> To:
>
>
>
> You have just received an HTML-rich eMessage that cannot be displayed by
> your email software. You may view this eMessage online with your
> internet browser by following this
> link:http://www.twelvehorses.com/S1/NLSWG9/J299U5WT/M/TXT/
>
> *The Network *#216
>
> *by Joe Pelayo*
>
> *1-800-786-1099*
>
> jpelayo@josephmichaels.com
>
> What do John McCain, Barak Obama and Joe Pelayo have in common?
>
> They were all interviewed on WSRadio recently.
>
> To hear my interview, click here:
>
> *http://www.josephmichaels.com/about/president.shtml
> *
>
> To hear the other interviews, well…you’ve probably heard enough from the
> other two in the last several months…Click the above link to hear Joe
> Pelayo interviewed on the PriceWaterhouseCoopers Radio show on
> WSRadio.com with host Steve Bengstrom. Be sure you have 5 minutes or so,
> and have your speakers on.
>
> ————————————————————————
>
> Joe Pelayo – On the economy and the stock market:
>
> Maybe Chicken Little was right after all and the sky IS falling. But,
> you know how the media is so often on the lookout for bad news because
> it sells more newspapers. I’m not saying everything is rosy, but to
> keep things in perspective, here are a few things to consider.
>
> Yes the Dow fell in big numbers and on one day fell more *points* than
> it had fallen ever has. But, did you know, that on a percentage basis,
> that big drop would not have even ranked in the top twenty drops of
> all-time? For example in 1987 the Dow dropped a record 500 points.
> Remember, they called it /Black Monday/? At that time it represented a
> 22% drop.
>
> From September 3^rd , 1929 to July 8^th , 1932, the Dow dropped 339
> points. That’s nothing in today’s measure in terms of *points*, but at
> the time, it represented an 89% drop from 389 points to 41.22, Wow!
>
> So when the media mentions a big point drop, do a few things… First,
> do the math and look at the percentages. Also, realize that for awhile,
> 300 is the new 100, you will see wide fluctuations for a time.
>
> As the media goes wild saying that, at this time, the Dow dropped the
> biggest point total in history. Don’t forget, 5 years ago, the Dow
> reached its high point total in the history of time! Keep things in
> perspective and even if Chicken Little says the sky is falling, remember
> that Joe Pelayo says that it isn’t. But, I am a devout optimist.
>
> The media would lead you to believe no one is hiring. However, we are
> receiving calls still for new searches. Smart companies, with the
> resources make use of times like these, to strategically top-grade their
> talent.
>
> Joseph Michaels, Inc. can help you recruit executives who don’t think
> the sky is falling. People who you can bank on to get things done, even
> in uncertain times. Call us today at 1(800) 786-1099.
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Joe Pelayo, C.E.O.
> Joseph Michaels, Inc.
> One Market Street
> Spear Tower, Suite 3600
> San Francisco, CA 94105
> Voice (415) 434-1099FAX (415) 434-1165
> Email: jpelayo@josephmichaels.com
> Website: http://www.josephmichaels.com/
>
>
> The Network is one of the most widley read executive e-newsletters in
> the world. If you were forwarded this email, reply to
> jpelayo@josephmichaels.com to be
> added to the mailing list.
>
> To remove from the mailing list click unsubscribe below:
>
>
>
> *Forward to a friend*
> >
> Unsubscribe from this service
> >
> Change format of future eMessages
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Related posts:

1. Google, remember: DO NO EVIL!!!
2. Spammers, Phishers, and Thieves – Oh My!
3. Network Solutions Still Sucks

Oh, Adobe… you’re like a hungry, hungry hippo, gobbling up new program ideas and features and doing everything you can to jam them into your current line-up until a system overload forces you to create new software bundles out of the overflowing mess of leftovers… just to be able to charge a nice, big chunk of change.  And you know the people will pay.

But the thing is… they don’t even change many of the features with each upgrade. In fact, it takes quite a few upgrades to see any kind of significant change… they seem to just make them bulkier and reorganize features… maybe add in a new program that the combination of all the others can handle already O_o

Plus the prices.

Those prices just have to be geared toward design companies, don’t you think? Anyone who can afford an individual license or upgrade must be REALLY dedicated and miss eating food for a few months or they work for a design firm that auto-updates their stuff.

Adobe, the little people have spoken!

Rather than just complain about how outlandish and overbearing your programs have become, we have a solution for you:  Littleshop.

No, not Little Shop of Horrors, just Littleshop.

A compact, lightweight Adobe-made Photoshop. Sure, there’s tons of small image editing programs with the same functionality but PS users know there’s a certain je ne sais quoi here that can’t be easily duplicated – plus, the entertainment industry (magazines, music covers, victoria’s secret, etc) has helped us coin the household phrase “Photoshopped” for every airbrushed face, pinched waist, and blurred naughty bits.  We still wanna be able to use that phrase T_T

Littleshop would contain all of the necessary editing features that we use blindly (filters, liquidation, layering, and defining tools) but lose all the splicing, slicing, web-editing, note-making, stamping, video-embedding, special fruitcake highlights… And for the reduced number (not quality) of features, would come a reduced price.

An on-the-go PS tool geared towards the designer who just wants a really nice image editor without all the crap so it loads faster and performs better resulting in stronger, smoother usability.  Like going “oldsk00l” but with a new “fierceness” to those old favs (thanks tyra).

Sure – not everyone will agree on what to add or take away but every great, minimizing solution has to have some compromises.

So, how ’bout it? Is this anything all you home/freelancing PSers would use?  Cheaper buy, cheaper upgrades, same old Adobe -> all the things you love about PS, in a travel-size package.

edit: We’ve received a few suggestions since this morning so here’s a quick overview:

Photoshop Express
In theory, a great idea, however it seems to be a little too lightweight for our previously described Littleshop and geared more for social networking, offering up a means to upload, slightly modify, and share images in gallery format.

Aviary
People interested in a similar solution, where everything is managed and edited online might take a look at Aviary’s Phoenix.  Aviary is also used as a community-based tool but it offers a wider range of PS-like qualities. Heavier, and online-managed, this is a good investigative starting point for designers who travel often and find themselves away from their personal computers & software. However, since this is all run 100% online and not necessarily lightweight by online-app terms, keep in mind about load times as they could be slower depending on your connection. (slower defeats the purpose)

Photoshop Elements
Well, okay… Elements is not lightweight for one, for two -> it’s geared more for photo editing though it could be Photoshop’s little sister.  It has some interesting features that differ from Photoshop as well as some “reduced PS functionality”, so it can be justifiably sold as it’s own unique program but ultimately it’s just another extension for Adobe products. It’s also more affordable and currently has a trial version.

GIMP
Another old friend mentioned GIMP, which is trying to keep up and compete with Adobe… that means it’ll continue to “bloat” just as much and definitely doesn’t offer a compact solution.  One big pro?  You can’t beat the price.

So… the more people who join the discussion here increase my curiousity: Is there already a Littleshop out there? I haven’t stumbled on a solution that works for me yet, but if you find something similar, let us know…

Related posts:

1. PETA – new Lord of the Flies
2. What the Hell is the GOP Smoking?
3. I feel like Homer…